All Entries Tagged With: "Position Size"

How to Lose Like a Winner

December 15, 2009 at 1:48 pm

I recently heard that in relationships, you can be happier if you choose to accept the whole person.  The idea is that instead of trying to weigh everything you like vs. everything you dislike, accepting them as generally positive is a better decision. Thankfully, my wife does that for me, looking beyond my numerous flaws and allowing my positives to overshadow them.

If you stop to think about it, this is a pretty good way to measure everything and everyone in our lives.  Staying objective about ‘it’ lets you recognize that overall it’s a positive thing.

The successful trader is no different.  He looks at his overall trading operations for a given timeframe, and if the profits are there, then the mission was accomplished.

That’s not always an easy thing to do.  In fact, I’d suggest that your inability to view your trading in that general light could put you in the popular camp of those who can’t cut it in this game.  It’s much more natural to allow specific trades to stand out and influence our line of thinking.  It can result in a directional bias, a pet stock, or a slew of other closed-minded patterns of thinking – all of which can lead to the destruction of one’s account.

What we want to do is to win.  And if winning is defined as overall profitability, then winning will involve some losses along the way.  You and I have to be able to lose like winners!

Here are 4 ways you can do that:

1.  Allow no single trade to define your trading. Dwell on it for a short time if you must, but then move past it whether it was a big win or a disappointing loss.  You might have put a lot of preparation, concentration, and capital into that one great idea, but it’s over now.  Either pat yourself on the back for a trade well done, or brush yourself off and get back on your feet.  Think about how you can use it to your advantage.  Maybe you fattened your account with the profits from it, or expanded your comfort zone because of it.  Great.  Get back on your horse.

2. Win the war, not every battle. Put on individual trades which have sensible risk/reward, but place emphasis on your overall operations rather than each individual effort.  Basically, see the forest and not just the trees!  Accept that there will be some some losing trades, perhaps frequently, depending on your timeframe, and aim to overcome them with larger or more frequent winners.  The point of taking this step is not to go to battle with every trade due to the mindset of having to be correct.  Accept it when you are wrong, and no single ‘battle’ will ever sink your ship.

3. Cast fear aside. Fear is arguably our biggest enemy in trading.  It can cripple you if you allow it.  This is manifested in ways like trading so small that a win or loss has virtually no impact, or maintaining stops so tight that the stock isn’t able to fluctuate naturally without shaking you out.  Those who spiral down the drain of losing are often times gripped by fear.  Don’t allow that to be you.  Maintain a healthy respect for the market, but don’t be afraid of it.

4. Learn from every loss. You’ve paid the tuition, so you might as well get the lesson!  This makes a loss something you can still gain from, and every winner does it.  Always seek out ways to increase your trading knowledge, whether through specific education like a stock trading course or simply picking up on subtle behaviors in price action that are starting to surface.  Is the market starting to change, or are you refusing to avoid methods which aren’t paying off?  Keep an open mind, always look for the lesson, and let the long-term losers be the stubborn ones.

Lose like a winner this week, and you’ll have more to show for it.

Thanks for stopping by and I’ll see you here soon with more. Until then…

Trade Like a Bandit!

Jeff White

Are you following me on Twitter yet?

Taking Risks

August 26, 2009 at 1:10 pm

It’s a known fact that in the market, you get paid to take risks.  We all know that, right?

But are you getting the proper rewards for those risks?  Are you taking the most appropriate kinds of risks? And perhaps most importantly, do you recognize the extent of the damage which can be done when you take on risks which are larger than you can handle?

I’m in the midst of re-reading a great book on risk right now (I’ll put up a post before too long about it, because it’s something you should read), and it’s got my wheels turning.  I’m reconsidering exactly what is risk, how much I should be taking, and why I need to embrace it.

Before sharing too much about the book, let me share with you a couple things which are on my mind right now, and I’ll lay out the rest in a later post once I’ve finished the read.

Defined Risks are the Best Kind

Option traders often refer to their ‘max risk’ on a given trade, because on some strategies they are able to truly limit their downside risk to a set amount.  If they’re long premium, the most they can lose is 100%, for example.

But an equities trader like me needs to think in terms of a different kind of risk factor.  Yes, I could buy 1,000 shares of XYZ at $20 per share, and my max risk (in terms of capital outlay) would be $20,000.  But that’s not realistic risk, because it’s so incredibly unlikely that stock is headed to $0 – especially over the course of a few days when I’d expect to be in the trade.

Instead, it’s important when trading stocks to think in terms of max $ risk if the trade fails (not if the underlying company fails).  I touched on this concept of dollar risk per trade earlier this month, but let’s look a little closer at it.  If I know my entry and I can designate a stop loss on the trade, then barring any drastic circumstances I’ll be able to exit at or very near that stop should an adverse move occur.  That’s the risk I want to be familiar with.  The kind of risk that says “if this trade doesn’t work out, what do I stand to lose?”

That’s very different from simply looking at every trade from a capital outlay perspective.  It’s a major shift for some of you to start thinking this way, but it can also make a major impact on your trading to implement it.

Know Your Exit

Making what could turn out to be a difficult decision before getting in the heat of the moment can be the most important part of your trading plan.  It’s one thing to hunt for entry after entry, locating breakout levels and spots where trend lines could get broken, but it’s an entirely different thing to know where you’ll look to exit that same trade, whether it moves in your favor or not.

I’ve said before that a good trade is usually a planned trade, and that definitely involves knowing your exit from the outset of the play.  So before you place that order to enter your next trade, decide on where you’ll get out of it.  Set a bracket order or jot it down, or at least verbalize it somehow!  That’s still better than thinking you’ll get around to it later.  Don’t procrastinate – decide on an exit.

Have a Goal

There is no reward without risk, and there should be no risk without reward.  Knowing this, there’s absolutely no reason why each trade shouldn’t have some favorable objective associated with it, so set a goal for each trade.  A realistic one that could quite feasibly be reached during the course of the trade.

Perhaps you’ll set a hard target and book profits once that level is reached regardless of how strong the momentum seems at the time.  Or perhaps you’ll plan to book partial profits at intervals along the way.

At the very least, having some idea of a level where your stock could move to is still going to help you formulate a game plan, even if you don’t choose to leave a resting order in that zone to book profits.

If you know your stop and you have some kind of upside expectation, then you’ll have a far better grasp of just what your risk is on a given trade and whether or not it should be taken.

Thanks for stopping by and I’ll see you here soon with more. Until then…

Trade Like a Bandit!

Jeff White

21 Questions from Last Week’s Chat

August 13, 2009 at 11:41 am

Last week’s trader chat generated quite a few questions.  A number of them we were able to address during the chat, but many more went unanswered.

If you were in attendance and didn’t get your question answered, look for it below. But even if you weren’t there, hopefully you’ll find this useful to observe.

Here are 21 unanswered questions from the session:

1.  Footbargain:  Jeff, what kinds of things do you look for to “trade the trader?”

• Thanks for your question Footbargain.  I wrote about this 3 1/2 years ago, and I still think it’s a very good exercise to regularly consider the flip side of your trade.  Obviously “they” are looking for a move in the opposite direction as you, but weighing their possible reasons, emotions, and technical exit criteria can really shed a lot of light on what it is you’re up against.  Of course, you’ll need to abide by your own designated levels on each trade, but understanding when the other side may get frustrated or overconfident can certainly give us a better feel for the trade  and whether or not it deserves to be on our screen.

2.  Tom:  Greetings Jeff, assuming we do get the “inevitable pullback,” what support levels would you be looking at to re-enter long positions?

• Hi Tom!  Using levels from the S&P 500, spots which have served as resistance or support in recent months would mark logical areas for other buyers to step in.  The ones I’m watching are 956 and 875.  I might add that if the market is selling off sharply into those levels I would not look to jump out in front of it.  Some stabilization in those areas would have far greater appeal.

3.  Jeff: Hey Jeff, I’m a paid subscriber and I do like your work.  Is Worden the main charting software that you use?

• Yes Jeff, TeleChart and StockFinder are the only charting programs I use.  I’ve found them to be very powerful and robust programs which offer many more features than I could ever possibly utilize, and yet they’re very simple to use.

4.  Dharm: Do you believe it is a bear rally?  Or are you in agreement a bull trend has begun?

• Hi Dharm, this really is a timeframe-based question, which leaves it open-ended.  In the short term and intermediate term, we’re without question in bull market mode.  The move up from the lows has exceeded 50%, which certainly qualifies as a bull market for me.  However, zooming out to the long-term timeframe, we are still well off the highs set less than 2 years ago.  We also on the long term timeframe have yet to pull back and produce a higher low, so for that timeframe I’m reluctant to classify this as a technical trend change yet (although I do think it will ultimately result in one).

5.  Ken: On stops being too tight, where would you place percentage wise on entry?  How often do you adjust the stop once you’re in the trade?

• Hi Ken, check out this post on stop loss placement for adjustment purposes(also includes links to prior stop loss posts which you may find helpful).  When it comes to the entry, I don’t have a set percentage I go by.  Rather, I’m going to base it on the chart, and most notably a failed pattern.  For some setups that might mean 3%, for others it might mean 6%, so it will vary.

6.  Ron:  Do you ever stay with the levered ETF’s more than a day, say a week?

• I do trade them in retirement accounts that way Ron, although I don’t want them to become long-term holdings.  What I prefer to do is start a position when I think the market is at an important turning point, then do my best to stick with that trend until it seems to have exhausted itself.  I have done well with the levered ETF’s in this fashion, and because they’re also optionable I don’t mind selling calls against them along the way.

7.  Julie:  I have lightened up significantly during the past three days.  The long I do have is an ETF.  How far down would you be comfortable seeing a pullback on the S&P?

• Hi Julie, I wouldn’t at all mind seeing a pullback reach the 956 zone or even 875 again (a level which has proven itself several times over the past year).  When it comes to your trade though, your original basis for entry and the timeframe you intended it to be should be the biggest consideration.  If it’s worked out well for you, then be sure to retain the bulk of those gains.  That may mean a partial sale up here after the run, or it may mean raising your stop, or a combination of the two.  I’ve found in my own trading once I start getting uneasy with a trade that it’s probably time to draw some lines in the sand and ensure that I get paid from that winning trade without giving it too much room back down should a pullback happen to arrive sooner than later.

8.  BullishBeauty:  Jeff, I do believe the correction is coming and I’ve lightened up as well.  Question is when a position gets to almost profit today, close it or hold til Monday?

• Hi BullishBeauty!  This question was referring to last Monday, so since we now have that hindsight let me instead address this from a conceptual standpoint.  When you’ve designated a target which is nearly reached but not quite, it’s decision-making time.  You either (A) stay patient and allow the stock to move away from that target and trust that it’ll eventually move through it, or (B) you recognize that your target may have been just a little too aggressive, and that therefore you should book (at least some of those) profits now.  My tendency is to go with choice B since I like to keep my capital turning over frequently and I like to ring the register often.  If you’re a more patient trader, the former scenario may be the way to go.  I do want to stress though, that whichever you choose, be consistent in it!  That way you’re decisive and the law of averages will run its course.

9.  Charles:  For the rookies can you explain the price and volume you use?

• Hello Charles.  I really like to focus on these 2 things, as they are the most important.  All else is derived from them, so they are the source of technical info for us as traders.  Price is of course where the stock is currently trading, but it’s also the price action.  I like to see how price is moving.  Is it moving fast, is it moving steadily, is it indecisive and confined to a trading range of some sort?  Basically, who is winning the battle?  And with volume, I want to see how it corresponds to price.  Is volume spiking as price climbs?  If so, it indicates to me that there’s a lot of participation among buyers and that therefore the move may have further to go.  Volume is the fuel that propels prices higher, so the more gas that’s in the tank, the farther it can go.

10.  Tom:  Jeff, can you offer some relevant scanning criteria for day/swing trading?

• Hi Tom, this is something I get asked quite often.  For me, I don’t rely heavily on scans to locate the plays I take.  What I actually do is start with all the stocks out there, then knock off some huge chunks of stocks which I know I don’t want to trade.  Those are the low-priced, illiquid stocks which hold no appeal to me as a trader.  By eliminating those, I get stocks with the ability to fluctuate regularly and which carry adequate volume for trading actively (I want plenty of buyers when I’m selling and plenty of sellers when I want to buy).  This generally means I’ll eliminate single-digit stocks and anything with fewer than 500,000 shares traded on an average day.  That still gives me a large list of stocks, and from there it’s a matter of spending the time to eyeball the list, extract the setups with some potential, and continually refine the list until I get some trading candidates.

11.  Dirk:  Hi Jeff & Charles…first of all thanks a lot for this great opportunity to share your knowledge with us.  I have a very general question regarding position sizing:  Given a certain allocation of money to swing trade, and based on that amount, a fixed amount (like 8-10%) one is willing to risk on a trade, is a large position (cheaper stocks) with a tighter stoploss preferable over a smaller position (higher priced stocks) with a wider stop loss?

• Hi Dirk, thanks for your nice comment and this question.  There really is no right answer here, as it will simply boil down to your own preference.  Give each style a try and see which one works best for you.  And I should clarify, that isn’t necessarily based upon the stock’s price, but rather how tight the pattern is that’s being traded.   I’d say it will really depend on your personality.  If you’re a patient trader and don’t mind waiting for a move to develop over the course of several days to several weeks, then wider stops are suitable.  If on the other hand you’d rather keep your money moving more often, then the tighter stops and more of a ‘base hit’ mentality for more frequent but smaller moves would be appropriate.  Personally, I fall into the latter category of tighter stops as I prefer to know rather quickly whether I’m right or wrong in the play.

12.  Brian:  What event do you think could cause the second leg down?

• That’s a great question Brian.  I suppose it could be economic data which begins to disappoint, or it could be that the prospects for growth begin to subside and a wave of profit-taking evolves into a deeper correction.  I honestly don’t know what it might be, but I’m also not a macro guy.  I figure sticking with the technicals will tell me all I need to know (when momentum slows, when selling pressure intensifies, when dips fail to get bought aggressively, etc.).

13.  Jon N:  I have a stock purchased as a medium to long term holding.  At what point would you consider changing this position and just taking profits (I am using trailing stops to protect profits)?

• Hi Jon.  I’m big on beginning with the end in mind and therefore knowing an exit strategy before entering a position.  Perhaps you designated some targets for this position when you initiated it, so I’d encourage you to stick with them.  But if you did not, then as I told Julie, I’d encourage you to weigh your comfort level in the trade.  If you’re getting uneasy about possibly giving back substantial open profits, then make some of those paper gains real by selling a portion of your position.  There’s some real value in making partial sales.  By lightening up into strength, you’re booking profits and raising cash to be re-allocated after a pullback takes place.  Having cash on hand after some widespread weakness sets in will be a great thing, and although many have forgotten right now that the market can still go down, they’ll eventually be reminded.  So I’d say once you’re uneasy, sell some and designate a stop for remaining shares as a safety net on the rest.

14.  Erb:  I have witnessed a lot of traders who I deem to be professional traders use terms like “I really just don’t have the feeling today” or another example would be what you just mentioned confidence.  I find these terms confusing as I do my best not to trade emotionally.  The chart is what it is, the price action is what it is.  So as a newbie again I find this quite confusing.  Not sure what is meant by the “feeling” or confidence if we are supposed to just trade what we see?

• Hello Erb, this is an excellent question.  And I never want to be confusing, so allow me to explain.  Newer traders don’t yet have a basis for ‘confidence’ or ‘feeling.’  Those both come over time after many many trades and lots of time spent watching the market.  Observing it closely over time will develop the occasional “I’ve seen this before” moments which will then play a role in the decision-making process.  But early on in one’s trading career, you are correct in that trading what you see should be the sole basis for decisions.  I also do not advocate trading emotionally, but what I’m saying here is that over time as you develop a feel for the markets, that will become part of what you see.

15.  George:  How do you build your watch lists for swing trades or longer?

• Thanks for your question George.  Beyond my comments for #9 and #10 above, it really is a process of digging through the charts to find setups which are being constructed and then weighing the risk/reward associated with each of them.  What I do is spend considerable time nightly to hunt through hundreds of charts, designating the occasional stock to be reviewed again.  The second run through will be on that limited list of stocks which seem to be exhibiting some momentum and/or are behaving as if they’re ripe for a move.  I’ll draw my trend lines to clarify the pattern being built, then I’ll gauge the urgency of the pattern based on price and volume in the most recent days.  Once I weigh that and decide if there’s a clear-cut entry and exit for the play, then I’ll set up the swing trade.  The key here though is that when I’m swing trading, I understand my entry, stop, and target levels before I place that bracket order for the trade.

16.  Juergen:  Jeff, I often get stopped out because of too tight stops.  I do this because I don’t want to lose money when I’m positive.  Any advice to change this (set a wide stop first and narrow it down when the stock moves in my direction)?

• Hello Juergen, I’m glad you asked this.  Getting shaken out of trades frequently can be frustrating, unless it’s an acceptable part of your methodology.  For example, the trader who takes many small losses but catches the occasional huge winner can be just fine over time.  But it sounds like you’re not satisfied with that so let me offer a suggestion.  First, cut your trade size in half.  Ultra-tight stops and the fear of losing tend to come along with positions which are too large, so change that first.  Next, start setting wider stops.  Consider how much the stock in question tends to move on an average day, or set stops beyond short-term support zones.  That will allow the stock to fluctuate normally and keep you in the trade longer, taking you out only once the stock has truly shown a change of character.

17.  Naif:  Jeff, can you name a couple of your favorite books on trading?

• You bet Naif.  Jack Schwager’s Market Wizards series is excellent.  They are each interview-style books where each chapter is a conversation with a different trader.  There are many markets, timeframes, and styles represented in those books, and they offer a ton of insight.  Another book is by Martin Schwartz and is called Pit Bull.  He was in a Market Wizards book, and his candid story offers a ton of value, making it another excellent read.  Nicolas Darvas’ How I Made $2,000,000 In The Stock Market also is one of my favorites.  He shares the tough early beats of his trading career and explains how he devised a method to avoid making his most common mistakes, leading him to big success.  Finally, Edwin Lefevre’s Reminiscences of a Stock Operator is right at the top of my list when it comes to favorite trading books.  A very old book, it carries with it countless lessons applicable to today’s trading, making it a timeless book and a must-own.  I’ve read each of these multiple times and I gain something new from them each time I re-read them!

18.  Eric:  It looks to me like a blow-off top in FUQI.  Am I reading this right?

• Hi Eric.  FUQI has certainly been a huge mover in recent months, and it’s gone parabolic in recent weeks.  As you know, the largest moves tend to occur during parabolic uptrends, but trading them also involves added risk.  Currently the stock is basing between $26-30, but I have no desire to call a top there yet.  Although a sharp drop could develop there at any time, the momentum train is running and deserves respect.  If you’re long, this is a great spot to do some selling, but if you’re looking to initiate a short sale, then waiting for some confirmation of a top (with the formation of a lower high) would be best.

19.  John:  Jeff, to develop your style of trading, did you do backtesting or did you mainly use trial and error?

• Hello John, thanks for your question.  Truth be told, I am not a proponent of backtesting.  I believe that might reveal some insights for what has historically happened when certain conditions are present, but when it comes to basing confidence of trades on what data says, it’s incredibly difficult to make the transition.  Backtesting involves no emotion, and yet trading carries with it a lot of emotion, so there’s a major disconnect there in my opinion.  Instead, I go with trial and error, or what I recently referred to as testing 1-2-3.  When I have real money on the line, I will learn faster and more intently than simply reviewing data.  By doing this, it also elevates my trust in a certain methodology over time, whereas taking a computer model and converting it into trading a real account is a very different story.

20.  Jay:  Can you speak a bit about how you track your trades, and do you use a trading journal?  Thanks.

• Hi Jay.  I’ve always noted my trades on a sheet of paper, an actual grid marking several conditions (Time, Prices, P&L, etc.).  Noting the reasoning for a trade, what was thought about it during the trade, and of course having the hard numbers to help calculate a variety of things tied to one’s results are imperative to have in my opinion.  My newsletter also serves as a diary of sorts for me, as I note each day when I’m in swing trades what I like or dislike about the price action and why I’m adjusting my stop.  So that’s my current system.  For those who would rather automate this process, there’s an excellent tool called StockTickr which can import trades from various brokers and is capable of generating all kinds of reports tied to your results data.  It’s a great way to see visually what’s working and what isn’t, usually shown to you in a different light than you’ve ever considered.

21.  Benjamin:  Hi Jeff, thanks for doing the Friday chat and am really enjoying it. What do you make of the relatively light trading volumes in the last few weeks, especially in the face of rising stock prices?  Do you view them as bullish or bearish signs or neither?

• Hello Benjamin, I’m happy to have had the chance to do the chat (and this follow-up).   With the relatively light trading volumes, I think there are a few factors there.  One is that there’s a lot of contentment in the market.  Prices keep rising, volatility is very low, and therefore fewer see the need to take action on the sell side.  So traders accumulate gradually, and we see some lighter volume than we saw last fall when the bottom was falling out.  Another factor is that it’s summertime, and that’s just common.  Traders take vacations, leaving fewer at their desks to buy and sell, and resulting in some lighter volume.  I’m not trying to read too much into it, because the biggest issue is what price is doing.  Right now it’s trending higher, so I’m reluctant to get bearish until price gives me a reason to.

Thanks for stopping by and I’ll see you here soon with more. Until then…

Trade Like a Bandit!

Jeff White

Are you following me on Twitter yet?

Stop Loss Placement, Part 3

August 5, 2009 at 8:44 pm

To continue the series on stop loss placement, it’s time that we build on both Part 1 and Part 2 by taking things a step further.

In this segment, I specifically want to clarify a major advantage of basing our stops on the chart. Of course we’ll know where to get out if the pattern happens to fail, but there’s one thing many traders fail to focus on in relation to that. It’s an equation, and a simple one, but it gives us our position size.

Dollar Risk Per Trade

If every stock were the same price and carried with it the same volatility, and if every pattern we traded happened to carry the same exact chart scenarios, Part 3 of this discussion wouldn’t exist.

But each stock is a little different than the next. Each setup will vary from the previous one we entered. And of course, the distance from our entry to stop isn’t going to be the exact same from one trade to the next.

So what we need to do if we want to maintain a consistent dollar risk per trade is to determine an amount we’re willing to lose on each trade in case we are wrong. Let’s face it, some trades aren’t gonna work, and we’re going to get stopped out.

Once we know how much we’ll be willing to risk (in terms of a set $ amount, or a set % of our account value), then we can combine that into a simple equation to give us our position size.

$ Risk Per Trade / Distance from Entry to Stop = Position Size

Watch this clip and let me explain more thoroughly with some specific examples. It was also posted over at the Trading Videos site, but I’ve embedded it here for your convenience.

And if you have questions pertaining to stops, add them to the comments section or contact me directly and I’ll try to work those into the next few segments.

Let me highly suggest clicking the “HD” on the video player and then going full-screen for best quality.

Update:  Check out Part 1, Part 2 and Part 4 of this series!

Thanks for stopping by and I’ll see you here soon with more. Until then…

Trade Like a Bandit!

Jeff White

Are you following me on Twitter yet?

Testing 1-2-3

May 12, 2009 at 7:17 am

I’ve written before about my opinion of backtesting, but let’s go a different direction here and talk about just plain-Jane testing.

If you were told that a diet pill would have you in that beach body by June, you’d probably be skeptical.  But given enough evidence, you just might try it.  Tentatively.

We’re no different in our trading.  Those of us who trade daily, who observe the price action and who are truly students of the market will on a regular basis run across something of interest.  Maybe it’s a routine in the overall market (such as early strength or late-day weakness) that seems to provide an opportunity.  Or perhaps it’s a setup that’s been producing some phenomenal moves.

Whatever ‘it’ happens to be, the odds are that you’re initially intrigued by it but yet reluctant to really go for it and trust it.

Why that is, I don’t know.  Human nature I suppose.  But regardless, when we do identify that anomoly which could quickly prove profitable for us as traders, we have to find out if it’s legit.

Enter: the test.

Let’s suppose your standard trade size is, oh, 1000 shares.  Or maybe it’s $20,000 per position.  However you define your standard position size, throw that out the window when it comes to testing a brand new trade idea.

Because the first time you do it, even the 5th time you do it, it’s not about making money.  It’s all about gaining some insights into how that idea plays out.  It’s about getting a feel for how it acts.  It’s about building a little confidence in that setup before you go for it for realz.

So cut that size down by, oh…90%.  I’m saying take 10% of your standard size and give that trade a shot.

Trade it so small that you won’t feel it – win or lose.  Because remember, the point is to start getting a feel for how it might go.  Removing the risk we all feel which is tied to performance is crucial in the testing phase, so that’s a necessity.  Trade tiny and see what happens.

As you start to gather a little data and see some ways you might improve on entry, exit, or timing, then you’re getting closer.  And again, you most likely haven’t made or lost much at all during this test process – because that isn’t the point.  Just feel it out, evaluate the info which comes back to you, and adjust.

Then, once you’ve got it down and have developed a more sound methodology for putting on and taking off that trade, only then is it time to step up the size.  And then have at it, because that’s the point at which it’s about making money.

Anything prior to that is merely a test.

Jeff White
President, The Stock Bandit, Inc.
Swing Trading & Day Trading Service
www.TheStockBandit.com

[tags]Stock Market, Day Trading, Stock Trading, Investing, Swing Trading[/tags]